Donald Trump is nominated for the highest political office in the United States. All public campaign-related actions, comments, statements, speeches, 'tweets', etc. (now) require serious examination.... and analysis.
How else are most of us able to know and understand whether he is fit -- and worthy -- of the Oval Office?The words he speaks (via various platforms) matter. They're important. Often, per the excerpt further below; "the rhetoric is the candidate".
>>>Updated insert; understanding Donald Trump (and probably certain supporters). Suggested 8/10/16 article (link), as 'pre-reading' for what follows, below. New window opens, no affiliation.
...Anything but a fact, anything except the truth:
(YT video link. No affiliation.)
(Insert: "Hillary wants to essentially abolish the Second Amendment...."....is a shameless, debunked falsehood. One off-site source. New window opens: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/jul/21/donald-trump/despite-new-adverb-trumps-claim-about-clinton-want/)
Linked to the source, here is Dan Rather's 8/9/16 Facebook post (re the Trump comment, above.) No affiliation or ownership here:
"...No trying-to-be objective and fair journalist, no citizen who cares about the country and its future can ignore what Donald Trump said today. When he suggested that "The Second Amendment People" can stop Hillary Clinton he crossed a line with dangerous potential. By any objective analysis, this is a new low and unprecedented in the history of American presidential politics. This is no longer about policy, civility, decency or even temperament. This is a direct threat of violence against a political rival. It is not just against the norms of American politics, it raises a serious question of whether it is against the law. If any other citizen had said this about a Presidential candidate, would the Secret Service be investigating?
Candidate Trump will undoubtedly issue an explanation; some of his surrogates are already engaged in trying to gloss it over, but once the words are out there they cannot be taken back. That is what inciting violence means.
To anyone who still pretends this is a normal election of Republican against Democrat, history is watching. And I suspect its verdict will be harsh. Many have tried to do a side-shuffle and issue statements saying they strongly disagree with his rhetoric but still support the candidate. That is becoming woefully insufficient. The rhetoric is the candidate.
This cannot be treated as just another outrageous moment in the campaign. We will see whether major newscasts explain how grave and unprecedented this is and whether the headlines in tomorrow's newspapers do it justice. We will soon know whether anyone who has publicly supported Trump explains how they can continue to do.
We are a democratic republic governed by the rule of law. We are an honest, fair and decent people. In trying to come to terms with today's discouraging development the best I can do is to summon our greatest political poet Abraham Lincoln for perspective:
"We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union, when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature."
Lincoln used these stirring words to end his First Inaugural Address. It was the eve of the Civil War and sadly his call for sanity, cohesion and peace was met with horrific violence that almost left our precious Union asunder. We cannot let that happen again."
-- Dan Rather, 8/9/16 Facebook post
BTW: Here's what courageous Republican leader Paul Ryan said about the same. Off-site 8/10/16 article link, new window opens, no affiliation: